| 
						
							
								Otago Witness , 
								Issue 2829, 3 June 1908, Page 65 SUPREME COURT. MATRIMONIAL AND DIVORCE. BOOTH V. BOOTH.  Petition by
					Bridget
					Mary Booth for a 
					dissolution of her marriage with William Booth, of Dunedin, 
					labourer, on the ground of habitual drunkenness and cruelty.
					 Mr B S. Irwin, who appeared in 
					support of the petition said the parties were married on the 
					14th May. 1902, at St. Joseph's, Cathedral, Dunedin. 
					Petitioner was then 19 years of age and respondent was 24. 
					Immediately after his marriage and, unfortunately, prior to 
					his marriage, though it was not generally known, it was 
					found he was addicted to drink and had served a large number 
					of sentences in gaol for offences, the result of 
					over-indulgence in drink. He had served a sentence of six 
					months for assaulting his wife - and another of three months 
					for assaulting her, the one assault being committed in 
					Masterton and the other in Wellington. He had practically 
					done no work since his marriage.  Petitioner, in her evidence, said 
					respondent had stabbed her with a knife in Masterton and. 
					received six months' imprisonment, and had broken her nose 
					and blackened her eyes, for which he received a sentence of 
					three months at Wellington. His first act of cruelty was to 
					throw a lighted lamp at petitioner about three months after 
					they were married. He was now in gaol serving a sentence for 
					assault and robbery committed at Dunedin.  Evidence was also given by Julia
					Mary
					Gawn (the mother of 
					petitioner) and Detective Ward, the latter stating that 
					respondent had 24 previous convictions recorded against him 
					during the past eight years.  A decree nisi was granted, to 
					become absolute in three months; costs on the lowest scale 
					against respondent.             |